top of page
  • Writer's pictureZeddBytes

Is Flutter Nearing its End?

Updated: May 20


The recent news of Google laying off staff from the Flutter and Dart teams sent shockwaves through the developer community.


This, however, wasn't the first time concerns about Flutter's future surfaced. Even before these layoffs, developers expressed apprehension about it.


Unlike established frameworks that leverage popular languages like JavaScript, Flutter uses Dart. 


Many developers viewed it as an additional hurdle, especially for those already comfortable with other languages.


Now this latest development begs the question: Is Flutter dead? Should developers abandon ship?


And should companies be wary of choosing Flutter for their mobile app project?


But before we answers these questions and dive further into what the future holds for Flutter, let's take a brief look at its history.


What is Flutter?

Launched in 2015, Flutter is an open-source toolkit from Google designed for building applications that can run on multiple platforms like Android, iOS, Windows, macOS, Linux, the web, and even Google’s Fuchsia.


It uses Dart as its programming language and offers a collection of pre-designed widgets and tools.


Essentially, with Flutter, you write your code once and it works across different platforms.


The architecture includes a reactive framework, a rendering engine, platform-specific components, and foundational libraries.


This really appealed to developers, giving them a way to streamline development and reach a wider audience with less effort.


Statistics do paint a promising picture: Flutter enjoys a growing developer community, and renowned companies like Alibaba and BMW also adopted it for their applications.


However, a closer look reveals some potential cracks in the facade.


Beyond the Initial Hype

Despite its initial promise, concerns have emerged regarding Flutter's performance and user experience (UX).


Here's a deeper dive into some of the problems that hold Flutter back:

  • Evolving Landscape and Potential Decline: Google's recent layoffs in the Flutter team raise concerns about the framework's long-term commitment. While a vibrant developer community exists, a potential decline in official Google support could lead to slower development and fewer resources in the future.

  • Performance Limitations:  Flutter's reliance on its own rendering engine can lead to performance bottlenecks, especially with complex animations on less powerful devices. This might be a deal-breaker for applications that need high-fidelity graphics or smooth user interactions.

  • Limited Native Feel: Achieving a truly native look and feel across all platforms can be challenging with Flutter. This is because developers are restricted to the framework's widget set, which might not perfectly replicate platform-specific UI elements. This limitation could be crucial for apps that need a seamless native experience.

  • Web Development Caveats: Flutter for web offers cross-platform compatibility, but it comes at the cost of limited access to the vast JavaScript ecosystem. Developers might struggle to integrate popular web libraries or frameworks, potentially limiting functionality for web apps.

  • Dart Adoption Curve:  While Dart is a relatively easy language to learn, developers comfortable with established languages like Java, Kotlin, or Swift might face an initial learning curve. This additional hurdle can impact development timelines and resource allocation, especially for teams without prior Dart experience.

  • Complex State Management: Managing application state – the data that dictates what's displayed on the screen – is difficult with Flutter. Stateful Widgets, Flutter's built-in state management solution is cumbersome and error-prone in larger applications. Similarly, the Flutter community has responded with numerous third-party state management solutions like Provider, BLoC, and Riverpod. However, these solutions come with their own complexities. Provider can introduce boilerplate code and potential dependency injection issues, while BLoC has a steeper learning curve due to its separation of concerns between UI and business logic.


Roadblocks for Flutter Web Development

One of Flutter's initial appeals was its ability to create cross-platform apps, including web applications.


However, this functionality hasn't lived up to the initial hype. Here's why Flutter for web might not be the best fit:

  • Performance Considerations:  Flutter web apps can exhibit performance issues, especially on older or less powerful devices. This is because Flutter uses its own rendering engine instead of relying on browser-optimized rendering techniques. For webs apps that need a smooth performance, Flutter might not be the ideal choice.

  • Development Trade-off: While the promise of a single codebase for web and mobile development is attractive, it can come at a cost. Developers familiar with web development tools and workflows might find Flutter's approach less intuitive. Debugging web-specific issues can also be more complex with Flutter.

  • SEO Challenges: Flutter web apps can struggle with Search Engine Optimization (SEO) as they rely on Dart for rendering. Search engines primarily crawl and index content written in HTML and JavaScript.  While Flutter can generate SEO-friendly elements, it can add an extra layer of complexity compared to traditional web development approaches. This can make it more difficult for search engines to understand and rank Flutter web apps effectively.


For these reasons, many developers are turning to established web development frameworks like ReactJS for their projects. 


These frameworks offer deeper integration with the JavaScript ecosystem, potentially better performance, and a more natural development experience for web-focused developers.


The Looming Shadow of the Google Graveyard

While Flutter's potential and some of its features are promising, a dark cloud hangs overhead in the form of Google's history. 


The company has a reputation for shutting down projects that fail to meet expectations, often with little warning.


Popular ventures like Google Reader, Google+, and Orkut all rose to prominence before being abruptly discontinued. 


In fact, there is a website dedicated to all the projects Google has discarded. Don't believe me? Check it out for yourself here.


This pattern of project abandonment, known as the "Google Graveyard," raises a critical question for developers: could Flutter be next?


Further, the implications of Google abandoning Flutter could be severe. Developers who invested time in learning Dart and the framework would see their efforts wasted. 


Partially completed projects built with Flutter could become stranded assets, with dwindling community support and limited options for migration or bug fixes. 


Even if you were to migrate to another framework, the cost of migrating a partially built app to a new framework can be substantial, further compounding the potential losses. 


Moreover, the risk of a large investment turning into a dead end, both in terms of time and money, can be a significant deterrent, especially for projects with a long development lifecycle or those requiring ongoing maintenance.

This potential for wasted resources and stranded projects is a major concern for developers and companies considering adopting Flutter.


While Google maintains that recent layoffs are part of a restructuring and not a sign of abandoning Flutter, the shadow of the Google Graveyard looms large, adding a layer of risk to choosing Flutter for new projects.


What's the Future Like?

While Flutter offers a unique solution for rapid cross-platform development, its potential future uncertainties and limitations require careful consideration before adoption.


When making a decision, you should prioritize project requirements, risk tolerance, and team expertise.


For projects demanding exceptional performance, a strictly native look and feel, or intricate web functionalities, alternative frameworks might be a safer bet.


If you're a developer with a risk-averse mindset or lack Dart experience, you might also want to explore other options like Kotlin Multiplatform Mobile (KMM) or established frameworks like React Native.


By using native development tools and adhering to platform design guidelines, you can unlock each device's full potential.


This helps you achieve a silky-smooth performance even for complex applications – an area where Flutter's reliance on its own rendering engine might introduce limitations.


Additionally, these alternatives excel at building apps that integrate into each platform's ecosystem. 


With frameworks like React Native boasting a community of over 90,000 developers and over 80,000 open-source libraries, developers can easily make use of pre-built solutions and a wealth of knowledge for faster development cycles and easier troubleshooting. 


For projects demanding the best possible experience on each platform, the potential gains in performance, user experience, and development efficiency can be a game-changer.


While the initial learning curve for these alternatives, like KMM or React Native with their platform-specific languages or frameworks, might be steeper compared to Flutter, the long-term benefits are significant.

Comentários


bottom of page